Debugging

"The more closely you look at one thing, the less closely can you see something else."

attributed to Heisenberg...

Caos natural

Muita da ordem natural tem sua pedra basilar no caos. Não acreditas?
Pensa nos cristais de gelo; analisa como se formam, sempre com diferente aspecto, e apercebe-te que nenhum deles é igual a outro. No entanto és capaz de reconhecer e perceber imediatamente que é um cristal de gelo!
Queres mais um exemplo? Pensa agora nas árvores, cuja variedade é imensa e dentro dessa variedade cada uma é única. No entanto és capaz, não só de reconhecer um pinheiro como um pinheiro, como também reconheces a família a que uma árvore pertence!
Pois na natureza é tudo idêntico. Tudo revolve à volta de padrões, os quais temos a capacidade inata de os reconhecer. Assim acontece não só com o pequeno mas também com o grande, são padrões que governam o universo, não a exactidão.
Ainda dúvidas? Queres mais um exemplo? És humano. Imagina outro humano a teu lado, em tudo tão diferente de ti, no entanto em tudo teu semelhante.
Assim são os desígnios do caos.

CVR

Pensamentos

"Se um facto exterior te causa aflição, não é ele que produz essa perturbação, é o juízo que formulas sobre ele. Mas tal juízo, de ti depende eliminá-lo num segundo. Se o que te aflige é algo atinente à tua disposição de espírito, quem te impede de corrigir a tua maneira de ver? Da mesma forma que te apoquentas por não realizar o desígnio qu se te afigura racional, porque não redobrar de esforços para o executar, a não andar para aí a gemer?"

em Marcus Aurelius, "Pensamentos", Livro VIII-47,
Biblioteca de Editores Independentes.

Questões estratégicas no futebol português

Quem me conhece sabe que não gosto de futebol, e tirando o jogo ocasional em que de facto presto atenção, no fundo o meu único intuito está na cerveja e tremoço, e não no jogo. No entanto não pude deixar passar esta, que coloco aqui, de tão boa que está.

P.S.: A quem é do Benfica, tente ver de uma perspectiva neutra e achar piada, porque até está bem feito... Deixem-se de clubismos! Já chega.

My results on the quiz: What philosophy do you follow?

Well, nice quiz... only one big problem: the wuthor is assuming a guy is religious, or has a religion. Some 5 questions would assume that. For a person that would not believe in God, or even could believe but wouldn't believe that the scriptures would be the 100% word of God (and not even the law of God, since it resembles more the law of men), then how can you disagree or agree with things you can't have an opinnion... Well, but here it goes:

What philosophy do you follow? (v1.03) created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as Hedonism Your life is guided by the principles of Hedonism: You believe that pleasure is a great, or the greatest, good; and you try to enjoy life’s pleasures as much as you can. “Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!” More info at Arocoun's Wikipedia User Page... Hedonism 95% Existentialism 85% Justice (Fairness) 65% Utilitarianism 50% Kantianism 45% Divine Command 40% Strong Egoism 30% Nihilism 15% Apathy 5%

Indiana Jones 4

Well, what can you say about this movie? Like almost all recent Spielberg movies, Its only to see in theaters. I mean, if you see it this in your house, it will not be such a good experience. This is bad, since with the older Indiana Jones movies, it doesn't matter if we see them on the theater or on our TV screen, it's the same: cool entertainment. But I'm dispersing about this movie. With this I wanted to say it's a nice experience, like seeing Transformers or War of the Worlds: very nice on the theater screen, but I never want to see them again outside of it... So probably I will skip Indiana Jones 4 when its on TV on a Sunday afternoon.
Now about the movie itself, I though it was a weak plot. Yeah, with all Indiana Jones we have something esoteric happening, like the Ark of the Covenant releasing electricity, or some indian guy removing the heart with his bare hands, or a Crusader with 700 years old... Yeah, they all have these unreal stuff, but come on, it's like, 2% of the movie, not 20%. And I'm not including the nuclear explosion. In fact, that was the part I mostly liked in the film, since it had that cheesy connection to the Ark of the Covenant from the first movie. When I saw the warehouse in the theater, I almost though 'they want the ark...'. But returning to the subject, Aliens??? come on... surely Lucas could come up with something better... I mean, Indiana Jones is a arqeologist right. I know there exist lot's of speculation in people about aliens and the South American ancient cultures, but that's it, speculation. Surely they could come up with something different. The Indiana Jones I was expecting to see would have more to do with facts than fantasy.
Now, the rest of the film is very forced and predictable. Who had not though, when Shia LaBeouf refers to his mother, in Marion from the first movie? And the part when she says it was his son, come on, that was so predictable. I was really hoping for that not to happen, not that Shia LaBeouf wouldn't be a good successor, but due to the cliché!!! About the action, the movie has lots of action, and very viewable, but extremely unrealistic. Yeah, jumping from a plane in a rubber boat and surviving is not very realistic, or the several snakes scenes done in the first movie, but in this film, almost all the action is impossible. In a jungle, with almost no roads, have a sword fight on top of a vehicle going 50 km/h... And the shocks, crashes, etc. It's totally unrealistic. If the other movies where like that, this would not be negative... But the fighting scenes in the other movies are realistic. Even the famous scene with Harrison Ford going under the truck... It was filmed, there where no effects, and he had rib injures after that. This in fact is a problem of CGI, and particularly of the latest Spielberg/Lucas films (taking out the Munich). They have so much CGI available and they put it in almost every tough scene (...otherwise it would be difficult to shoot), that somewhere they've stopped asking: Is this possible? Could this really happen? Is this bullshit? (the other day I've made a post about Shoot'em Up with Clive Owen... this is the perfect example of a movie where they put the impossible and try to pass it like real).
To end, I heard there will be an Indiana Jones 5, which will also be the first double sequel to another well known set of films: Indiana Jones meets Starwars: the raiders of the lost Lightsaber. Oh yeah, now you will be able to see Indiana learning the way's of the force with Yoda.

On animal rights and sterilization: the other side

I believe many people would like that animals have rights and that there would exist laws concerning their welfare. In fact in some countries this exists and I'm also in favor of that. But It also looks like that the most active participants of this are animal owners (I mean, the domestic ones).
I should warn now that I don't have pets, that my mother always told me pets should be free and have their own lives, not their owner's lives and I also don't stand for the sentimental bullshit that some people come to me saying 'you don't know the joy of having a pet' or whatever. I know people who owns animals and In this question (as in all) I try to be rational and pragmatic when possible.
I find most confusing when people who speak for animal rights and that they are sentient beings, thus possessing will, are capable of sterilize them, some without any moral or ethical problems. I mean, isn't that hypocrisy? To say they have a will to choose a path, however they should submit to their owner's will and be sterile? Doesn't sound right to me. Of course, what most pet owner's I know would say: 'it's a matter of public health'. Well, I agree, the society is more important as collective entity than any individual entity, and thus even in life and death the society is more important. In fact, speaking in Darwinistic terms, the sterilization of an animal or human is a genetic homicide. So, in terms of public health, because the society is large enough to have a power of life or death over an individual (even if the society does not enforce it), it can say 'sterilize those animals'. Nevertheless, I don't think this is the motivation pet owner's have in mind when sterilizing them. I think this public health thing acts more like an excuse than a motivation, a pretext to the fact that it would be nice not having the cat pissing the floor to declare territory when in puberty. And who wants to have the dog horny around, or being afraid of suddenly realizing the bely of our female animal is increasing. Yeah, people don't want to be responsible for those things, those 'natural' things. All they want is a fur ball that moves and is funny. They don't really respect animals nor their natural will (and genetic mission), they want fur balls, and they will go to the point of saying 'my pet is more happy in being with me, even if he is sterile, than of living on the street. It's better for him.'. I have heard this sentence in the past, and I'm not kidding. These owner's are totally sensible for animal suffering, but not with animal rights. Who says otherwise is being hypocrite. Come on, nobody in it's perfect mind would think 'maybe I should put my son sterile, if I do this, he will never have puberty problems'. Having said this, if a owner just comes here saying 'you can't compare a children with a pet', then I hope he also says he doesn't agree with this whole thing on animal rights.
I could go on, but I've just exposed my point on the subject, and maybe I will continue on another day. But I must say that for me, the only difference in pet sterilization (due to the unwilling of the owner to cope with the animal puberty and nature), and the infamous 'bonsai cats' (some serious sick shit of having cats inside bottles during their growth to have them become small for the rest of their life's), is on the animal suffering, because on the philosophical question of respecting the animal will and nature, it's the same: these people want fur balls, not animals.
My advice: let the animals be free and live their own lifes.

Grande documentario

Este documentario, de seu nome "Notícias de uma Guerra Particular", tenta mostrar os diferentes lados da situação violenta vivida no Rio de Janeiro: a perspectiva dos policias, dos traficantes, e dos moradores das favelas. Vejam isto (está em português...)

Clive Owen at his best

This is a great movie! For those who may have seen just a bit, it sure sounds strange. I mean, who would see this if not an Rambo fan or something like that?... If you think that, you've got it totally wrong!

This is a kind of parody to the shooter's films where the main guy is impermeable to bullets and pain, but with a little important thing: it doesn't try to cover itself up as something different. Instead, you get totally impossible action and shots, in a way that becomes really good. The clichés are all so well mixed up, yet served so raw, that it becomes one of the best movies I've saw lately. The carrot becomes some kind of substitute for Popey's spinaches, the bullet proof baby, the no-belt accident to enter the other car and kill everyone inside, and all for the sake of fun! See this.

Desabafo

Sad day.

The 300...

Hello. I'm surprised, the last time I came here, it was 200... now it's 100 more. People really have nothing better to do. Nevertheless here it goes, the last great movie I've saw, and probably all of you know it by now. It was the winner of this year's Golden Bear award, from the Berlin festival: Tropa de Elite. For those who have seen City of God and have like it, of this harsh reality from Brazil, now you can see the other side, the police forces people and what they have to endure. Difficult to say if the worse comes from their enemies or their institution...


The film follows the officers that belong to BOPE, the brazillian SWAT team in Rio de Janeiro. One wants to get out due to his first son birth, the other is divided between two worlds (policeman and junkie college students)... Well and You can easily find a trailer in YouTube, but you should expect some strong images (not gore, strong!). If your distaste of police brutality is high, then expect to be shocked. In fact, form what I browsed in the web, both the director and some actors saw the film as a critics to police excess, but the publics opinion became very favorable to the movie and those controversial police acts. In fact I believe in the end, this movie was (or will be) kind of beneficial to BOPE, a bit like when a movie in the 70's about the MOSSAD was released, and in the following years the applications to the Isralie secret agency were very high (or at least is what you're told in Victor Ostrovsky excellent book). In my opinion, this film is even better than No Country for Old Men, so go and see it.

The 200th...

So, I had 200 visitors to this really bad blog. What were these people doing?, Why do they come here? Can't they waste their time with higher accomplishments? Surely your life must be miserable to come and see such a lousy thing.

Nevertheless, my last activities:

Finished reading "Junky" from William S. Burroughs. Great book, it really gets you on reading and reading. I understand his later books are quite strange and though to read, but this is very linear and you can almost feel that environment where he lived.

Almost finishing the "The Nuremberg Interviews". At least I've finished the defendants and passed to the witnesses. It's though. I think some who would read this, would think they are nice guys thrown into the madness by their leaders, and they have no responsibility (yeah right!). Others would point that they almost look like nice guys, but are liars, henchman's and surely guilty. I tend to the 3rd hypothesis: they are nice guys, and then it becomes even more frightening how nice guys can indeed become butchers and conduct genocide. Indeed, evil can arise from the hearts of the most common people. There are no devils or angels, only normal people doing good and bad deeds.
To those who are interested but not in the mood or patience to read, there was a documentary on google video some time ago, but it looks like it was removed. Perhaps you can find it by alternative ways.

In the middle of Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness". For those who do not recognize right away, it's the book that gave origin to the movie Apocalypse Now, and while that one is set on the vietnam war, this is set on the 19th century Congo.

Finished all the episodes of Jericho, so I'm anxious to this season premature finale (25 march I think). In my opinion I liked the series a lot and I'm sorry to see it's cancellation. I must say I was not quite fascinated from the start. But maybe it's good for it to finish now. In this way it had no time to decline, and perhaps it will be well remembered when people watch it later on.
Even so, I would like a good surprise in the end...

The Unit: it's too bad how this great series was 'put in the bubble' by CBS without mercy (lol, Jericho is a CBS show also...). If the last episode was it's end, then it's a really lousy end, since it was not supposed to be that! The story goes: the show was airing, the writer's strike put it and a lot of series 'in the bubble', the writer's strike ends, most of the series return, The Unit is still 'in the bubble'. Such a great show.

Dune

Finally, I've finished reading Dune. All the 6 books that compose the original series. Though, especially when the formula is near the same: the first 4/3 are composed by lot's of dialogs, almost all taken at one or two main locations (depending on how much groups of people are), and the last 1/4 is ruled by a critical period (war, coup d'etat, an assassination), where the action takes place.
With these words it looks I'm diminishing the quality of the books, but the truth is far from that. Yes, there are boring parts, and or you have an excellent dialog, or a boring one. But the excellent ones far outstand the poor. Dune books are more of an political-philosophical treaties than sci-fi (at least for me). Albeit there are strange ideas, often involving some kind of human supernatural power or abilities (not paranormal, the characters supposedly acquire these capabilities with, well evolution in learning methods), the only true sci-fi thing is the Holtzman theory that is applied to almost anything.
I think there are things that were added later, that may be a bit incongruent with the first book and the others, like the powers of the Bene Gesserit (and even Paul), which in the first book aren't all explained/declared.
Cutting the cheap talk, here are sentences of the first book that I liked allot:

A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it.

Most educated people know that the worst potential competition for any young organism can come from its own kind.

There is no escape - we pay for the violence of our ancestors.

"He who can destroy a thing has the real control of it," Paul said. "We can destroy the spice."

The second book, 'Dune Messiah':

Power tends to isolate those who hold too much of it. Eventually, they lose touch with reality... and fall.

'God Emperor of Dune' :

Enemies strengthen you. Allies weaken.

'Heretics of Dune':

Bureaucracy destroys initiative. There is little that bureaucrats hate more than innovation, especially innovation that produces better results than the old routines.

When strangers meet, great allowances should be made for differences of custom and training.

'Chapter House Dune':

Religion (emulation of adults by the child) encysts past mythologies: guesses, hidden assumptions of trust in the universe, pronouncements people made in search of personal power, all mingled with shreds of enlightenment. And always an unspoken commandment: Thou shall not question!

"Humans can balance on strange surfaces," Odrade said. "Even on unpredictable ones. It's called 'getting in tune'."

Seek freedom and become captive of your desires. Seek discipline and find your liberty.

Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: The Towel

Just about the most massively useful thing any interstellar Hitchhiker can carry. For one thing it has great practical value:

1. You can wrap it around you for warmth on the cold moons of Jaglan Beta;
   
2. sunbathe on it on the marble beaches of Santraginus Five;
3. huddle beneath it for protection from the Arcturan Megagnats as you sleep beneath the stars of Kakrafoon;
4. use it to sail a mini raft down the slow heavy river Moth;
5. wet it for use in hand to hand combat;
6. wrap it round your head to avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal, which is such a mind bogglingly stupid animal, it assumes that if you can't see him, he can't see you;
7. and even dry yourself off with it if it still seems clean enough.

An essay on love, gratitude and hate

Woman, thou that have gained eternal gratitude towards this man, for it were his hands that have stole thy son's life, from certain death. Indeed this man came out of pure intentions, and he himself could have been injured beyond repair. Nevertheless, thy natural feelings towards him, that undoubtedly you have, are few besides gratitude. No better deed he could have done, to acquire your highest regard, but it is just that, regard. If not so, tell me woman: do you love this man? Besides your gratitude, there lies nothing more.

I wonder, what would happen if this man, this same man who has saved thy son's life, who was delayed his ultimate fate, and thus, gained the right to that life, would kill him, finishing death's deed. Would thy new feelings towards him be of mere ingratitude. I believe no, and these feelings would be of extreme prejudice, of pure hatred. Indeed they would be much more lasting than thy previous, and albeit these were solely based on gratitude (always below love), these last would rank the highest on the scale of disgust.

Can you see the point?

One image for a thousand words... and for music, how much?

Have you ever compared, and perhaps realized, the power of audio-visual information with just audio? Which of these, in your perspective, win? What would you prefer to choose, if you would have to opt by one?

Visual information is obviously extremely important, but I'm not writing about the ability to see the world around us, but of the visual information that is stored in some way, like a movie or TV, preferably one that has an audio component...
You see one TV series, and will you see it again? Or a movie? Well, I like a lot of films, and some I will see more times in the future, but it would be difficult to watch a movie twice in the same day. I mean, is it not a story, that loses a bit of its fun after knowing its closure? Of course, there are brilliant exceptions, like David Lynch films, or the excellent photograph in Kubrick's films... but the bottom point is: to see films twice... difficult (and even more with TV series!!!).

Now, with music, well? Isn't that a whole different matter?... How many times a day can you repeat hearing the same music? How many times you sing in your thoughts a song, and in the first moment that you can spare, you go an hear it? For myself, I can sing a music in my thought, and even decompose it sometimes (if I know it well). But to hear it, is it not a pleasure? It has nothing to do with movies. It is a completely different power, this of these sequences of notes, flying through the air in tiny pressure waves. Is this not worthy of a thousand images? Is it not amazing the time you can give of yourselves, just listening to music? Well, I can and I'm glad.

...

The sleeper has awaken.

Alone... such a great writting for such a lack of feelings

From childhood's hour I have not been
As others were - I have not seen
As others saw - I could not bring
My passions from a common spring -
From the same source I have not taken
My sorrow - I could not awaken
My heart to joy at the same tone -
And all I lov'd - I lov'd alone -
Then - in my childhood - in the dawn
Of a most stormy life - was drawn
From ev'ry depth of good and ill
The mystery which binds me still -
From the torrent, or the fountain -
From the red cliff of the mountain -
From the sun that 'round me roll'd
In its autumn tint of gold -
From the lightning in the sky
As it pass'd me flying by -
From the thunder, and the storm -
And the cloud that took the form
(When the rest of Heaven was blue)
Of a demon in my view -

March 17th 1829, by Mr. E. A. Poe.

...

I have everywhere sought,
and nowhere found,
So I lift the bleedin' bodkin,
And trust the grief deepest in.

The gleaming bodies of the infinite skies,
Have for my spirit, the cold charm,
Of death's welcoming eyes
In secret to my soul, they are ideals of old.

Ad Astra by Arcturus

Shit happens!

It really does, not kidding...